Click on the icon to listen to audio of Prof. Paul Atchley Search KU News releases Subscribe now to receive
KU News by email
Contact:
Ranjit Arab, University Relations, (785) 864-8855.
LAWRENCE -- The New York State law banning drivers from using handheld
cellular phones is seen by most people as a step in the right direction.
However, a University of Kansas professor who has done extensive research on
driver distractions says it's more like a step sideways.
"They didn't ban all cell phones; they said that people who bought
hands-free cell phones could get their fines removed, which is really
missing the point entirely because hands-free cell phones are no safer than
hands-on cell phones. It's the conversation -- not touching the buttons on
the keypad -- that is critical," said Paul Atchley, assistant professor of
psychology.
Currently, 35 other states are considering legislation similar to the New
York law. But Atchley, who has conducted several studies on drivers' visual
attention, said lawmakers are misguided if they think accidents will
decrease simply by moving cell phones from driver's hands and placing them
on dashboards.
"It's not having your hands taken away, it's having your mind taken away
from the road. As people who drive a standard car -- or stick shift -- know,
you can drive a car with one hand, because you have one hand on the stick.
But when you start talking, it's not the actual holding onto the object
that's important, it's the planning of the conversation, which takes away
resources from attending to the road," he said.
According to cognitive studies conducted by Atchley and colleagues both at
KU and across the nation, the average person is only capable of dividing
their attention among four objects at any given time. Throw a cell phone
conversation into the mix while driving, and it's a recipe for disaster, he
said.
"In a cellular phone conversation, it's not just the process of listening.
Not only do you have to listen, but you also have to think about what the
person is saying, and plan for your response, and that's taking some
resources that you would be using to plan to drive," he said.
Cell phone proponents have argued that the devices are no more distracting
than radios, CD players or in-car conversations. Atchley disagrees.
"The research so far has shown that other things are not as distracting," he
said. "It's easier to turn off that particular distraction. Most of us, when
we are driving and the traffic is really heavy, just ignore the radio. We
can selectively turn that off."
Similarly, in-car conversations differ from cell phone conversations because
both parties have an immediate feel for the flow of traffic and can
discontinue the conversation when traffic gets too hectic.
Because this is a relatively new area of research, Atchley said there is
little quantitative research out there that details the connection between
cell phone usage and traffic accidents. Still, he points to the 1997 study
published in the New England Journal of Medicine by Donald Redemeier of the
University of Toronto and Robert Tibshirani of Stanford University. They
found that cell phone conversations while driving -- whether hands-on or
hands-free -- quadrupled the likelihood of an accident. Those researchers
have since revisited the study and now say that they may have underestimated
the risk.
Furthermore, he said, the cell phone industry hasn't been forthcoming with
its own safety-related research.
"The interesting thing is that automobile manufacturers actually have
simulation facilities where they look at how these devices affect in-car
driving performance. They've had these facilities for years and they haven't
really released any information that these devices are safe," Atchley said.
"You'd think that if you were going to market a product, you would release
the safety data -- if you have it -- to indicate it's safe."
Until more quantitative research is gathered and made available to the
public, it might take more unfortunate high-profile accidents, like the
recent one involving supermodel Nikki Taylor, to make the general public --
and lawmakers -- understand the hazards associated with cell phone use and
driving.
"One aspect that disturbs me is the idea that people think they have a right
to have a cell phone or they really need to use a cell phone. It's not your
right if it's a public safety issue," he said.
In the meantime, Atchley said he hopes that more states consider banning
people from using cell phones -- of all varieties -- while driving.
"I think cell phones do have merits -- they clearly can help in emergency
situations," he said. "But in those kinds of situations, if it really is an
emergency, you should be pulled over anyway. You shouldn't be trying to deal
with any emergency while driving, unless there were some really unique
circumstances."
-30-
This site is maintained by University Relations, the public relations office for the University of Kansas Lawrence campus. Copyright 2001, the University of Kansas Office of University Relations. Images and information may be reused with notice of copyright, but not altered. kurelations@ku.edu, (785) 864-3256.